Wednesday, February 8, 2023
HomeAnimalsPETA Information FTC Criticism Over Accidents at SeaQuest

PETA Information FTC Criticism Over Accidents at SeaQuest

SeaQuest is a series of direct-contact shopping center aquariums that confine wild animals to crummy enclosures for anxious public encounters with gawking people.

Wild animals don’t wish to work together with people, and subjecting them to a barrage of unnatural, direct-contact encounters will not be solely anxious for them but additionally harmful for everybody concerned. To make issues worse, SeaQuest workers are demonstrably unfit to deal with wildlife appropriately and infrequently don’t intently monitor the general public’s interactions with animals.

Peta GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

SeaQuest clearly is aware of all these items, as there have been many accidents to guests and workers members at plenty of its areas throughout the nation, leading to damaging buyer critiques and a number of other federal citations.

FTC complaint: Abel injured at SeaQuest

A mom informed PETA that her 3-year-old toddler was rushed to the emergency room after sustaining gaping wounds when an iguana “jumped from a rock and latched [onto] his arm.”

However the firm nonetheless hasn’t ceased its harmful operations.

So PETA is pushing again but once more.

On November 7, we filed an enormous criticism to the Federal Commerce Fee (FTC), calling on the company to analyze SeaQuest and the Austin Aquarium—one other seedy indoor mall petting zoo—over unfair commerce practices in obvious violation of federal legislation. Our groundbreaking criticism alleges that the businesses promote harmful, direct-contact encounters with wild animals, which have precipitated a considerable variety of bodily accidents to unsuspecting prospects.

Many incidents have occurred at SeaQuest areas, together with the next:

  • At SeaQuest Littleton, a pufferfish bit an 8-year-old baby; an Asian water monitor named Spartacus bit an worker; an iguana jumped onto a toddler’s chest and “acquired a claw inside her mouth”; an iguana jumped onto an worker’s shoulder and caught a nail below the individual’s eye; iguanas have bitten guests on a number of events; a pacu bit a toddler; a porcupine pufferfish bit a patron, who later reported numbness and issue respiratory; and a pig bit a customer, who reportedly needed to go to pressing care.
  • At SeaQuest Fort Value, an iguana latched onto the arm of a 3-year-old boy, who needed to be rushed to the hospital to obtain stitches; a capybara bit the hand of a kid who had reached over the aspect of an enclosure; a fish bit a toddler’s fingers; a sloth bit a customer whereas workers weren’t absolutely monitoring the encounter; and an Asian small-clawed otter injured prospects, even after the USDA cited the ability over earlier accidents involving this animal.
Seaquest: Baby's hand bitten by fish

The mom of an toddler informed PETA that her baby had been bitten at SeaQuest Fort Value, leaving bloody scrapes throughout three of her fingers.

  • At SeaQuest Trumbull, a pig bit a buyer’s finger, a kinkajou scratched a toddler’s face whereas leaping for a bowl of meals, and an otter bit two youngsters.
  • At SeaQuest Utah, an Asian small-clawed otter bit a visitors’ thumb, a kinkajou bit a visitor, and a coatimundi named Gus bit a customer and an worker.
  • At SeaQuest Roseville, a sloth bit a visitor throughout an encounter. That yr, a number of of the animals on the facility have been recognized with illnesses that might unfold to people, together with ringworm, chlamydia, and toxoplasmosis.
  • At SeaQuest Las Vegas, a coatimundi reportedly scratched a boy, who was then taken to the hospital. As well as, a kinkajou bit an worker and a small-clawed otter named Chip bit an worker throughout a presentation.

PETA’s Urging the FTC to Take Motion

The FTC Act prohibits unfair or misleading commerce practices. SeaQuest and Austin Aquarium market themselves as secure, family-friendly operations whereas encouraging prospects to interact instantly with wild animals, who can behave unpredictably and might doubtlessly be carrying transmissible illnesses. Prospects proceed to be injured by animals whereas partaking in actions that SeaQuest and the Austin Aquarium encourage.

PETA’s criticism asserts that the direct-contact encounters provided by these services trigger a considerable variety of bodily accidents to customers and due to this fact are unfair commerce practices that violate federal legislation. We’re calling on the company to analyze each firms over these alleged unfair commerce practices.

Right here’s What You Can Do

Whereas PETA has labored tirelessly to show SeaQuest for its merciless exploitation of animals—from offering native officers with proof of animal deaths to placing up an enormous “bloody” billboard close to a SeaQuest location—10 of its services are nonetheless open to the general public. However you will help us shut these depressing operations down.

By no means go to SeaQuest, the Austin Aquarium, or every other doubtful mall aquarium or roadside zoo. If in case you have been injured at a SeaQuest location, make sure you report the incident to native officers and call PETA.

Click on the button under to take motion in opposition to SeaQuest:



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular