Wednesday, February 8, 2023
HomeNatureOctupole-driven magnetoresistance in an antiferromagnetic tunnel junction

Octupole-driven magnetoresistance in an antiferromagnetic tunnel junction


Pattern progress

Mn3Sn/MgO/Mn3Sn MTJs

A W (9 nm)/Mn3Sn (12 nm)/MgO (3.3 nm)/Mn3Sn (42 nm)/Ta (5 nm) (left: substrate facet, proper: floor facet) multilayer was grown on a MgO(001) substrate. The W (9 nm)/Mn3Sn (12 nm)/MgO (3.3 nm) layer was fabricated by the molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) methodology below ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) at a base stress of two × 10−8 Pa. The MgO(001) substrate was annealed at 800 °C for 10 min within the MBE chamber earlier than deposition. The W layer (9 nm) was deposited at a charge of 0.1 Å s−1 at 300 °C and subsequent annealment at 800 °C for 10 min. The Mn3Sn layer (12 nm) was fabricated at a charge of 0.25 Å s−1 with coevaporation of Mn and Sn, during which the deposition charge of Mn and Sn was set for the stoichiometric composition Mn3Sn. The Mn3Sn layer (3 nm) was first deposited at room temperature after which annealed at 320 °C. The additional Mn3Sn layer (9 nm) was deposited at roughly 260 °C. Subsequently the MgO layer (3.3 nm) was fabricated at a charge of 0.1 Å s−1 at room temperature. The stack was later annealed at 600 °C for 30 min. As proven in Prolonged Information Fig. 1a, streak patterns have been noticed by reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED), confirming the formation of epitaxial progress of flat interfaces within the W (9 nm)/Mn3Sn (12 nm)/MgO (3.3 nm) layer. The incident electron beam is parallel to the MgO [100] route. The stack was transferred to a magnetron sputtering chamber with base stress larger than 5 × 10−7 Pa. Within the sputtering chamber, the Mn3Sn (42 nm)/Ta (5 nm) layer was grown at room temperature by magnetron sputtering at a charge of 0.1 nm s−1 and an influence of 60 W and Ar gasoline stress of 0.5 Pa. After deposition, the complete stack was annealed at 450 °C to crystallize the Mn3Sn layer (42 nm), just like our earlier work for polycrystalline Mn3Sn42.

To analyze crystallinity and orientation, cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) photos for the W (9 nm)/Mn3Sn (12 nm)/MgO (3.3 nm)/Mn3Sn (42 nm)/Ta (5 nm) multilayer have been taken at room temperature utilizing a business TEM system (JEOL, JEM-ARM200F). The utmost working voltage was 200 kV. Samples for TEM remark have been ready from the TMR gadget, consisting of the multilayer. utilizing a targeted ion beam (Hitachi Excessive-Tech NX2000, Ga 2–30 kV, Ar 1 kV). Earlier than processing, a protecting movie (C (100 nm)/W (100 nm)) was deposited on an space of 10 × 3 μm2 on the pattern floor and the pattern subsequently thinned by targeted Ga and Ar ion beams. The TEM photos introduced in Fig. 2a and Prolonged Information Fig. 10a present the sharp interface between the Mn3Sn layers and the MgO layer. Nanobeam electron diffraction patterns of the Mn3Sn (prime), MgO, Mn3Sn (backside) and W layers present epitaxial progress from the W layer to the MgO barrier (Prolonged Information Fig. 10b–e). As proven in Prolonged Information Fig. 10a, we fabricated the epitaxial Mn3Sn layer on the MgO substrate(001)[010]W((001)[bar{1}10]) stacks which have the ((01bar{1}1)) orientation aligned near the route of thickness. On this orientation the kagome aircraft, which is the magnetic straightforward aircraft for the cluster magnetic octupole, is oriented alongside practically 60° off the traditional route of the movie—that’s, the c axis of Mn3Sn is about 30° off the traditional route of the movie, as proven by the clear inexperienced aircraft in Prolonged Information Fig. 10f. Right here the scale of the ((01bar{1}1))-oriented Mn3Sn crystallite was confirmed to be roughly 100 nm. The MgO barrier on the epitaxial Mn3Sn (backside) layer has round 10 nm crystallites and exhibits the (001) orientation with a mosaicness of about 10°. An atomic association of every layer exhibits a possible epitaxial relationship (Prolonged Information Fig. 10g) during which the lattice constants of MgO, W and Mn3Sn are thought-about to be a = 4.21 Å for MgO, a = 3.17 Å for W43 and a = 5.66 Å and c = 4.53 Å for Mn3Sn6. Whereas the Mn association will not be completely sq. and should thus have 90°-rotated variants within the movie aircraft, the out-of-plane orientation for all variants must be just like that noticed within the current examine (Prolonged Information Fig. 10a).

Fe/MgO/Mn3Sn MTJ with an in-plane magnetized Fe layer

A MgO (5 nm)/Fe (30 nm)/MgO (about 3 nm)/Mn3Sn (42 nm)/Ta (5 nm) multilayer was deposited on the MgO(001) substrate. The MgO (5 nm)/Fe (30 nm)/MgO (about 3 nm) was fabricated utilizing the MBE methodology below UHV, as described above for the Mn3Sn/MgO/Mn3Sn deposition course of. The MgO(001) substrate was annealed at 800 °C for 10 min within the MBE chamber earlier than deposition. First, a MgO layer (5 nm) was grown on the substrate at a charge of 0.1 Å s−1 at room temperature. Subsequent, the Fe layer (30 nm) was deposited at a charge of 0.25 Å s−1 at room temperature and subsequently annealed at 350 °C for 15 min. Lastly, the MgO layer (about 3 nm) was fabricated at a charge of 0.1 Å s−1 at room temperature. As proven in Prolonged Information Fig. 1b, clear streak patterns have been noticed by RHEED, confirming the formation of epitaxial layers with flat interfaces within the MgO (5 nm)/Fe (30 nm)/MgO (about 3 nm) layer. The incident electron beam was parallel to the MgO [100] route. The stack was transferred to the magnetron sputtering chamber and the Mn3Sn (42 nm)/Ta (5 nm) layer moreover grown at room temperature by magnetron sputtering at a charge of 0.1 nm s−1 with an influence of 60 W and Ar gasoline stress 0.5 Pa. After deposition, the complete stack was annealed at 450 °C for 30 min.

Fe/MgO/Mn3Sn MTJ with a perpendicular magnetized Fe layer

A MgO (5 nm)/V (30 nm)/Fe (0.6 nm)/MgO (about 3 nm)/Mn3Sn (42 nm)/Ta (5 nm) multilayer was deposited on the MgO(001) substrate. The MgO (5 nm)/V (30 nm)/Fe (0.6 nm)/MgO (about 3 nm) was fabricated by the MBE methodology within the UHV MBE chamber. Much like the strategy used for the Fe/MgO/Mn3Sn stack, we first deposited a MgO layer (5 nm) on the substrate at a charge of 0.1 Å s−1 at room temperature. The V layer (30 nm) was deposited at a charge of 0.25 Å s−1 at room temperature and subsequently annealed at 500 °C for 20 min. The Fe (0.6 nm) and MgO (about 3 nm) layers have been deposited at room temperature at charges of 0.05 and 0.1 Å s−1, respectively. As proven in Prolonged Information Fig. 1c, clear streak patterns have been noticed by RHEED, confirming the formation of epitaxial layers with flat interfaces within the MgO (5 nm)/V (30 nm)/Fe (0.6 nm)/MgO (about 3 nm) layer. The incident electron beam was parallel to the MgO [100] route. The stack was transferred to the magnetron sputtering chamber and the Mn3Sn (42 nm)/Ta (5 nm) layer moreover grown by magnetron sputtering at room temperature at a charge of 0.1 nm s−1 with an influence of 60 W and Ar gasoline stress 0.5 Pa. After deposition, the complete stack was annealed at 450 °C for 30 min. On this stack the V layer was used because the seed layer, which might help to induce the sturdy perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of ultrathin Fe (below 1 nm)44,45.

We carried out all fabrication processes in situ, together with pattern switch from the MBE chamber to the sputtering chamber. The sputtering-grown Mn3Sn layer (42 nm) on the MgO layer was used for all samples. The composition of this Mn3Sn layer was decided to be Mn3.15Sn0.85 by scanning electron microscopy–energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Though this composition is Mn wealthy, additionally it is a secure composition for a single section of the D019 Mn3Sn42, during which extra Mn randomly occupies the Sn web site6,46.

MTJ fabrication and magnetic and transport measurement

We encapsulated MTJ gadgets in SiOx, with electrical contacts shaped from 60 nm Pt. Corridor measurements have been performed at 300 Ok in a business bodily property measurement system (Quantum Design). The sector dependence of Corridor resistivity was obtained after subtracting the longitudinal resistivity contribution, which was discovered to be fixed as a perform of magnetic subject. Zero-field Corridor resistivity, ρH(B = 0) was estimated as (ρH(B = +0) − ρH(B = −0)/2. Right here +0 and −0 have been used to point zero magnetic subject approached from +2 and −2 T, respectively. Tunnelling resistance was measured with a two-probe methodology in a probe system with an electromagnet at room temperature. A business supply measurement unit (Keithley 2400, Tektronix) was used to measure resistance for the microfabricated magnetic tunnel junctions. As a result of a set resistor of 1 kΩ was sequence linked with the MTJ to guard it throughout measurements, MTJ knowledge embody 1 kΩ from the fastened resistor. Electrical measurements recorded beneath room temperature have been carried out below 10−4 Pa in a vacuum chamber cooled by a helium compressor. The pattern substrate was fastened on a Cu pattern stage and temperature measured by a thermometer contained in the pattern stage.

MOKE magnetometry

The magnetic subject dependence of MOKE was measured utilizing a business system (NanoMOKE3, Quantum Design). The highest and backside Mn3Sn layers within the W (9 nm)/Mn3Sn (12 nm)/MgO (3.3 nm)/Mn3Sn (42 nm)/Ta (5 nm) stacks have been used for measurement in a polar MOKE configuration below out-of-plane utilized magnetic fields between –1.3 and +1.3 T at room temperature. MOKE loops have been acquired utilizing a 660 nm semiconductor laser and a spatial mild modulator enabling acquisition of 20 hysteresis loops at a charge of 0.1 Hz. To acquire the MOKE sign, we subtracted the B-linear half originating from the extrinsic contribution (for instance, a Faraday impact of the optical lenses). Our MOKE measurements for the W (9 nm)/Mn3Sn (12 nm)/MgO (3.3 nm)/Mn3Sn (42 nm)/Ta (5 nm) stacks confirmed that the coercive subject of B(roughly 0.5 T) for the highest Mn3Sn (Fig. 2c, purple) was twice that of Bc (about 0.25 T) for the underside layer (Fig. 2c, blue), most likely as a result of distinction in buffer layers dealing with every Mn3Sn (W for backside and MgO for prime), in addition to to variation within the thickness of Mn3Sn.

Calculation of the projected density of states

The projected density of states (pDOS) of Mn3Sn and body-centred cubic Fe (bcc-Fe) was calculated with the Wannier features obtained utilizing the WANNIER90 package deal47,48,49, during which localized Wannier features are constructed by projection of Bloch wave features onto atomic orbitals. Bloch wave features have been obtained by density purposeful idea (DFT) calculations utilizing the QUANTUM ESPRESSO (QE) packages50,51. In DFT calculations, the projector-augmented wave pseudopotential with spin-orbit couplings52 was used, with change correlation taken under consideration by Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof-type generalized gradient approximation53. For Mn3Sn, the lattice constants a = 5.665 Å and c = 4.531 Å have been used54 and okay-point meshes have been 7 × 7 × 7 and eight × 8 × 8 for self-consistent subject (scf) and non-scf calculations, respectively. The cut-off energies of wave perform and cost density have been 80 and 320 Ry, respectively. Bloch wave features have been projected onto the s-, p– and d-orbitals of Mn ions and the s– and p-orbitals of Sn ions. For bcc-Fe we used the lattice fixed a = 2.87 Å, and eight × 8 × 8 and 12 × 12 × 12 okay-point grids have been used for scf and non-scf calculations, respectively. We set the vitality cut-offs of wave perform and cost density as 80 and 500 Ry, respectively. Bloch states have been projected onto the s-, p– and d-orbitals of the Fe ion. In Wannierization we set the okay-point mesh as 8 × 8 × 8 and 12 × 12 × 12 for Mn3Sn and bcc-Fe, respectively. Utilizing Wannier features we calculated pDOS with the 64 × 64 × 64 okay-point grid onto cluster magnetic octupolar ordered states of Mn3Sn and the magnetic ordered states of bcc-Fe.

Cluster magnetic octupole and its polarization

For the symmetry operation of the structural D6h level group, the non-collinear magnetic order of Mn3Sn has the identical transformation properties because the cluster magnetic octupole second, with ({T}_{gamma }^{x}=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(-{M}_{31}+{M}_{3-1})) and ({T}_{gamma }^{y}=frac{i}{sqrt{2}}({M}_{31}+{M}_{3-1}),)37,55. This octupole second has the identical irreducible illustration because the ferromagnetic dipole, ({J}_{x}=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(-{M}_{11}+{M}_{1-1})) and ({J}_{y}=frac{i}{sqrt{2}}({M}_{11}+{M}_{1-1})), and thus its ferroic order breaks time-reversal symmetry macroscopically. This additionally signifies that the cluster magnetic octupole is parallel to the weak ferromagnetic second (roughly 7 mμB/Mn) as a result of spin canting, which arises because of the competitors between Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interplay, change coupling and single-ion anisotropy56. Subsequently, the driving mechanism of the anomalous Corridor impact of Mn3Sn may be interpreted because the ferroic order of the octupole second of Mn3Sn, in the identical means because the ferromagnetic order of the dipole second of Fe. The cluster multipole idea is thus helpful for understanding the underlying physics on non-collinear antiferromagnets resembling Mn3Sn37. Within the calculation of octupole polarization, we estimated the expectation worth of the next operator with p = 3 and q = ±1 for the Bloch wave features obtained by generalized gradient approximation calculation:

$${tau }_{pq}^{(mu )}equiv sqrt{frac{4pi }{2p+1}}mathop{sum }limits_{i=1}^{{N}_{{rm{atom}}}^{(mu )}}{{boldsymbol{sigma }}}_{i}cdot {nabla }_{i}(| ,{{bf{R}}}_{i}, ^{p},{Y}_{pq}{({theta }_{i},{varphi }_{i})}^{* })$$

(1)

during which ({N}_{{rm{atom}}}^{(mu )}) is the variety of atoms of the μth cluster, σi is the Pauli matrices outlined for the spin levels of freedom of the ith atom, ({nabla }_{i}equiv frac{partial }{partial {{bf{R}}}_{i}}), Ri ≡ (Xi, Yi, Zi) is the place of the ith atom, Ypq are the spherical harmonics and Ri, θi and ϕi are the gap, polar angle and azimuthal angle, respectively, of the ith atom.

Estimation of spin polarization of Fe and Mn3Sn utilizing the Julliere mannequin

Based mostly on the Julliere mannequin1, the relative conduction change, ΔG between states 0 and 1 is described as ΔG = G × 2P1P2/(1 + P1P2), the place G, P1 and P2 correspond, respectively to the tunnelling conduction and spin-polarization ratio of the efficient tunnelling density of states of magnetic electrodes 1 and a pair of. The spin polarization of Fe/MgO in our gadget is assumed to be about 0.6 (ref. 45).

Fermi stage shift and resultant damaging TMR

Given the sturdy Fermi vitality dependence on the signal of octupole polarization (Prolonged Information Fig. 2c), the signal of TMR must be very delicate to the Fermi vitality of Mn3Sn. Subsequently, interfacial engineering might affect the Fermi vitality of Mn3Sn. Prolonged Information Fig. 4a exhibits the Corridor resistivity of Mn3Sn as a perform of temperature. When reducing the temperature, Corridor resistivity vanishes as a result of section transition from non-collinear antichiral to spin-spiral. Each the anomalous Corridor impact and non-zero spin polarization exist solely within the non-collinear antichiral section of Mn3Sn quite than within the spin-spiral section. However, section transition temperature detected by way of TMR (black circle) was round 100 Ok decrease than that (blue sq.) present in Corridor resistivity (Prolonged Information Fig. 4a). That is most likely as a result of the Fermi vitality of the interfacial Mn3Sn shifted as in contrast with that of the Mn3Sn movie, as a result of its contact with MgO. As well as, the distinct Fermi stage shift of Mn3Sn on the backside and prime might have arisen as a result of variation within the thermal annealing course of (Strategies). Right here we roughly simulated normalized TMR through octupole polarizations from backside τbackside and prime Mn3Sn τprime, normalized TMR = τbackside × τprime, assuming that the distinction in Fermi vitality shift is 1 eV (Prolonged Information Fig. 4b).

First-principles calculation of the tunnelling magnetoresistance impact with Mn3Sn electrodes

To theoretically simulate the TMR impact from first rules, we use the PWCOND package deal within the QE package deal57,58,59 during which ballistic transport alongside the z route is calculated by fixing the scattering drawback on the Bloch wave perform obtained by DFT calculation60. Usually for TMR, you will need to have in-depth understanding of the barrier materials61,62,63. However, earlier than investigating the function of the barrier materials it’s essential to find out whether or not there’s any TMR impact within the all-antiferromagnetic tunnel junction. Thus, in our calculation, for simplicity we use Mn3Sn for the electrodes and the vacuum for the barrier. In observe, we calculate the tunnelling conductance within the Mn3Sn/vacuum/Mn3Sn MTJ. The MTJ in our calculations is made by stacking Mn3Sn alongside the c axis: the conducting path is perpendicular to the ab aircraft of Mn3Sn. The schematics of the MTJ are proven in Prolonged Information Fig. 3a. We calculated transmissions for each parallel and antiparallel configurations; the cluster magnetic octupole moments of the 2 electrodes level in the identical and reverse instructions within the parallel and antiparallel configurations, respectively.

First, we separate the complete MTJ system into three components: left and the best leads consisting of the majority Mn3Sn and the scattering area, comprising a pair of two monolayers of Mn3Sn and the vacuum area between. We carried out the DFT calculation with QE for every of the three components. We set the okay-point mesh as 7 × 7 × 7 for the leads and seven × 7 × 1 for the scattering area. In calculation of the scattering area, the constraint on magnetic moments was imposed to stabilize the magnetic construction. After we calculated the digital construction of the scattering area within the antiparallel configuration, to easily join the leads and the scattering area within the transmission calculation we handled the doubled scattering area, which consists of the unique scattering area and its copy, hooked up to the unique one with its magnetic configuration inverted. On this means we calculated the digital construction of the Mn3Sn/vacuum/Mn3Sn/Mn3Sn/vacuum/Mn3Sn system. The doubled scattering area was reduce in half and solely the unique was thought-about in transmission calculations.

Then, connecting the leads and scattering area, we calculated transmission. We set the okay = (okayx, okayy) level mesh within the xy aircraft as 32 × 32. We obtained transmissions at every okay-point for the parallel/antiparallel configurations, TP/AP(okay); conductances for parallel/antiparallel configurations, GP/AP, have been decided by the Landauer–Büttiker system64,65,66,67, ({G}_{{rm{P/AP}}}=({e}^{2}/h){Sigma }_{{{boldsymbol{okay}}}_{perp }}{T}_{{rm{P/AP}}}({{boldsymbol{okay}}}_{perp })). The TMR ratio was calculated as (GP − GAP)/GAP.

The vacuum thickness, d, dependence of the whole transmission on the Fermi stage for the parallel and antiparallel configurations, is proven in Prolonged Information Fig. 3b. We additionally plotted the resistance-area product (RA) for every configuration, which is the normalized resistance given as (RA) = A/G, the place A is the cross-section space. We discovered that GP was bigger than GAP in all circumstances of d, and each GP and GAP virtually exponentially decayed with d, as proven in Prolonged Information Fig. 3b,c. We thus obtained the constructive TMR ratio (Prolonged Information Fig. 3d). Transmissions resolved by okay-points are proven in Prolonged Information Fig. 3e,f, which signifies that transmission behaviour does differ between the parallel and antiparallel configurations.

For comparability with the Mn3Sn/vacuum/Mn3Sn MTJ, we additionally investigated the transmission properties of a ferromagnetic MTJ with the vacuum barrier, the Fe/vacuum/Fe system. In the identical method as for the Mn3Sn/vacuum/Mn3Sn MTJ, we calculated digital buildings with out spin-orbit couplings of the leads composed by the majority bcc-Fe with 8 × 8 × 8 okay-mesh, and of the scattering area which has the vacuum sandwiched between a pair of 4 monolayers of Fe with 8 × 8 × 1 okay-mesh. We carried out the transmission calculation utilizing 100 × 100 okay-point grids. Prolonged Information Fig. 3g,h exhibits the d-dependence of complete transmissions and RA values on the Fermi stage for each parallel and antiparallel preparations. The TMR ratio with respect to d is plotted in Prolonged Information Fig. 3i, taking as massive a worth as that within the Mn3Sn/vacuum/Mn3Sn MTJ. The outcomes must be adequate to function a qualitative reference for the Mn3Sn/vacuum/Mn3Sn MTJ, whereas a small non-monotonic change within the TMR ratio was noticed, which may converge by the calculation with greater accuracy.

The digital states that dominate tunnelling transport correspond to electrons tunnelling within the regular route to the interface, and thus the polarization of such states is vital for dialogue of tunnelling physics68. Actually, the tunnelling conductance of the Fe/MgO/Fe MTJ has the height at okay roughly 0, supporting this idea61,62. In a extra complicated system resembling Mn3Sn, nevertheless, the states whose group velocity carries solely regular incidence parts exist not solely at okay roughly 0 but additionally at common okay factors69, and such states ought to largely contribute to tunnelling conductance following the ideas proposed by Slonczewski68. Prolonged Information Fig. 3e,f exhibits the in-plane momentum (okayx, okayy) dependence of transmission built-in over momentum alongside the tunnelling route. Notably, our outcomes make clear that transmission entails not solely these states at okay roughly 0, but additionally of the extensively prolonged momentum area within the Brillouin zone. Provided that the leads to the figures are these projected to the in-plane momentum, tunnelling electrons come up not solely from momentum okay of roughly 0 associated to regular incidence, however quite from total area of the Brillouin zone. Thus, to qualitatively perceive the mechanism of tunnelling conductance, we should always focus not solely on the states with okay roughly 0 however quite use the measure reflecting contributions from the complete Brillouin zone. Given the truth that the antiferromagnetic state of Mn3Sn may be considered because the ferroic order of cluster magnetic octupole, such a measure must be the summation of octupole polarization over the complete momentum house—the density of states projected onto octupole polarization.

Impact of interfacial buildings on transmission properties

We investigated the robustness of transmission properties towards variation in interfacial buildings within the Mn3Sn/vacuum/Mn3Sn MTJ. We examined two sorts of variation of the interface: interfacial dysfunction and lateral shift.

First we studied the impact of problems. We integrated interfacial problems into the Mn3Sn/vacuum/Mn3Sn MTJ by artificially shifting some atoms dealing with the vacuum limitations; we shifted upwards one of many Mn atoms within the decrease layer of Mn3Sn on the interface, and shifted downwards one of many Mn atoms within the higher layer of Mn3Sn. These atoms have been shifted by 0.113 Å—that’s, 2.5% of the c axis size of Mn3Sn, which doesn’t qualitatively change the digital and magnetic properties of the system. Prolonged Information Fig. 5a–c exhibits the outcomes of calculations towards the dysfunction with barrier thickness 4.531 Å. Whereas shifting of atoms decreased transmission within the parallel configuration and elevated it within the antiparallel configuration, general transmission properties didn’t change. We additionally examined the case during which atoms transfer inversely to the case above: the atom within the decrease layer moved downwards whereas that within the higher layer moved upwards. The outcomes of those calculations (Prolonged Information Fig. 5d–f) counsel that transmission properties didn’t qualitatively change on this case both. Whereas it’s higher to make use of a bigger supercell for extra exact analysis of interfacial dysfunction, we anticipate that TMR properties might not largely change from these proven right here.

Second, we examined the impact of lateral shift. Mn3Sn has two layers in a unit cell alongside the c axis—say, A and B. Within the calculations whose outcomes are proven in Fig. 3, layers A and B are on the interface, which we name geometry-I. Right here we additionally contemplate the case during which two B-layers face one another (see the inset in Prolonged Information Fig. 5i), which we name geometry-II. We present the outcomes of the calculations with geometries-I and II in Fig. 5g–i. These outcomes point out that the properties in tunnelling conductance don’t largely change, whereas complete transmissions in geometry-II take bigger values than these in geometry-I. We be aware that for geometry-II we take the doubled unit cell each for the parallel and antiparallel configurations, as a result of its geometry. We confirmed that the finite TMR impact is noticed for different lattice-matching configurations—that’s, when two electrodes have in a different way oriented straightforward axes of cluster magnetic octupoles by 120° in geometry-I (Supplementary Fig. 4). We additionally examined the TMR impact by shifting the higher layer of Mn3Sn alongside the a axis by half of the lattice fixed a, and confirmed that this shift qualitatively maintained the TMR impact (Supplementary Fig. 5).

Bias-dependent TMR measurements

The bias dependence of TMR can present helpful details about the vitality dependence of polarization41. Thus, we carried out TMR measurements as a perform of bias voltage within the Fe/MgO/Mn3Sn tunnel junction for each the perpendicular (EB) and parallel (E//B) configurations for the electrical (E) and magnetic fields (B), comparable to Fig. 3c,d, respectively. Within the following, we present the experimental abstract for the perpendicular (EB) case as a consultant instance (Prolonged Information Fig. 6). Prolonged Information Fig. 6a,b exhibits the minor loops below bias voltage of +0.6 and −0.5 V, during which Fe moments are switched whereas Mn3Sn moments stay fastened.

The important thing remark is the symmetric bias dependence of the TMR ratio on the perpendicular and parallel configurations (Prolonged Information Fig. 7). This turns into clear if we contemplate a bias-independent time period of the order of round 0.14 % (horizontal dashed line). In accordance with our measurement configuration, the recent electron arises from Mn3Sn and thus MR ought to replicate the unoccupied DOS of Fe for constructive bias (Prolonged Information Fig. 7a). On this regime, the spin polarization of Mn3Sn must be decided by the DOS of Mn3Sn within the neighborhood of the Fermi stage. Spin polarization across the Fermi stage in Mn3Sn is anisotropic and may be characterised by the tensor, as mentioned above. Thus, MR ought to have damaging and constructive indicators for perpendicular and parallel configurations, respectively (Prolonged Information Fig. 7b). This explains the next observations of our experiment. Specifically, after subtracting the fixed background MR time period of round 0.14%, we discover that MR has magnitudes just like the alternative indicators for perpendicular and parallel configurations. Bias dependence should come up from the unoccupied DOS of Fe and must be just like that noticed within the Fe/MgO/Fe MTJ5.

However, damaging bias ought to present the recent electron from Fe to Mn3Sn. Thus, MR can be decided by the spin polarizations of unoccupied DOS for Mn3Sn and DOS for Fe within the neighborhood of the Fermi stage. As in contrast with the constructive bias regime, MR within the damaging bias is strongly bias dependent (Prolonged Information Fig. 7b). This might be as a result of bias voltage dependence of the anisotropic spin polarization in Mn3Sn. Apparently, the MRs for each perpendicular and parallel MTJs converge at round 0.1% at bias V beneath −0.5. Most likely, it is a results of isotropic spin polarization of Mn3Sn from spin canting.

Measurement of the thickness dependence of TMR

The TMR in Mn3Sn/MgO/Mn3Sn MTJ was measured by variation in MgO thickness. When the barrier turned thicker, TMR worth elevated, in step with the theoretical calculations proven in Prolonged Information Fig. 2. We additionally carried out a comparability between experiments and calculations, as proven in Prolonged Information Fig. 8. Whereas these calculations use the vacuum barrier, we set the x axis to be the resistance space quite than MgO thickness itself, for readability.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular